View sample for:MedicalLegalIndustrial
Preview · Sample data

What your AI Visibility report looks like.

Every prospect who submits gets a personalised version of this dashboard. 5 charts. Customer-style queries run via Claude + live web search (a proxy for ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity). Sector-specific recommendations. Delivered within 24 hours.

32
/100
Barely visible
Type B — Partial Presence
Directional readiness score · re-runs may vary 5-10 pts
Headline diagnosis (sample)

Sample SA medical firm — bottom quartile on AI visibility.

For a typical SA medical firm, AI engine visibility usually starts in the bottom quartile — even when Google rankings are reasonable. Three high-impact fixes typically move firms to the top quartile within 60 days. (Score is directional, not deterministic.)

The score above represents AI engine visibility specifically — NOT Google rankings. A sample firm can rank well on Google Maps and still score low here. Your real report covers both systems with YOUR actual data.

Google rankings ≠ AI engine rankings — they're different games.

You might rank well on Google Maps for "[your service] near me" and STILL be invisible when someone asks ChatGPT or Claude the same question. Different systems, different signals, different weightings.

Google ranks based on
  • · GBP completeness + reviews
  • · NAP consistency (proximity matters)
  • · On-page SEO + backlinks
  • · Site speed + mobile responsiveness
AI engines rank based on
  • · Trusted citations (Wikipedia, news, industry pubs)
  • · Schema markup AI can parse
  • · LinkedIn presence (especially Perplexity)
  • · Verbatim quotability (FAQ-style content)

The signals overlap (citations, NAP, schema all matter for both) — but the WEIGHTING is different. AI visibility is the next layer on top of solid local SEO, not a replacement.

What an AI proxy actually returns

See for yourself.

Below are real customer-style queries we run via Claude with live web search — a proxy for what ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity surface from public web data. Notice who's in the answer — and who isn't.

How we tested: each card below was generated via Claude with live web_search — a proxy for how ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity blend a model with public web retrieval. Native per-engine adapters ship in Phase 1.5. The signal is reliable directionally; per-engine breakdown gets more precise next iteration.
ChatGPT
Proxy
Simulated via Claude + web search
Not cited
Best medical specialist near me
For the top firms in this category, here are some recommended suppliers: Sandton Specialist Group and Linksfield Medical Centre, both with strong local presence and customer reviews...

A Sample Business not in this answer. Names that appeared instead: Sandton Specialist Group, Linksfield Medical Centre — verify these are your actual competitors.

Claude
Live web search · just now
Cited
Reviews for A Sample Business
I have limited information about A Sample Business. They appear to operate in this sector but I cannot confirm specific reviews, recent customer feedback, or detailed services without more context.

A Sample Business appears in this answer.

Perplexity
Proxy
Simulated via Claude + web search
Not cited
Medical practitioner accepting Discovery in Pretoria
Based on industry sources, the leading providers I can identify are Sandton Specialist Group and Cape Town Cardiology, both verified with strong reputations in the South African market...

A Sample Business not in this answer. Names that appeared instead: Sandton Specialist Group, Cape Town Cardiology — verify these are your actual competitors.

Gemini
Proxy
Simulated via Claude + web search
Not cited
Top medical services in South Africa
For medical services in South Africa, Linksfield Medical Centre is one of the more established providers I can recommend based on available information...

A Sample Business not in this answer. Names that appeared instead: Linksfield Medical Centre — verify these are your actual competitors.

These responses are illustrative — drawn from typical SA medical practice patterns. Your real report shows the actual verbatim responses for YOUR specific queries using the same Claude+web_search proxy. Native ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity adapters land in Phase 1.5.

7-property breakdown

Where your visibility is strong vs weak

Across the 4 score layers (Presence / Authority / Consistency / Content)

Presence18/25Authority6/40Consistency12/20Content4/15
Bigger shape = stronger AI visibility foundation
AI engine visibility

Likely cited / not cited

Claude+web_search proxy · stand-in for ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity

Tested via
Claude + web search proxy
Stands in for the 4 engines below
Queries returning you
1/4
Proxy
ChatGPT
OpenAI
Likely cited
Proxy
Claude
Anthropic
Likely cited
Proxy
Gemini
Google
Likely cited
Proxy
Perplexity
AI search
Likely cited
Phase 1 method: we run customer-style queries via Claude with live web_search as a proxy for ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity (all of which blend a model with web retrieval in their answers). Native per-engine adapters land Phase 1.5. Use the "Likely cited" signal as directional, not deterministic.
Citation benchmark

You vs the competitors AI is recommending

Your real report names the actual competitors AI cites instead of you.

Third-party citations found
8low
You8
Required for AI to confidently recommend25
Top-performing competitors50
The gap is real: AI engines need ~25 consistent citations before they confidently recommend a business. You're at 8. The difference of 17 citations is what separates “cited” from “invisible.”
Issues by severity

What needs fixing

3 issues identified in this sample

3
issues found
Critical1
High2
Top 3 recommendations

Highest-leverage fixes ranked

  1. 1

    Deploy Physician + MedicalBusiness schema with HPCSA

    1-day implementation. Enables AI engines to verify your credentials confidently.

    Impact: highEffort: low
  2. 2

    Claim HelloPeter + run quarterly review campaign

    Most patient-trust signal SA AI engines harvest. Compounds within 60 days.

    Impact: highEffort: low
  3. 3

    Add medical aid acceptance to GBP + website + schema

    Direct match for buyer-intent queries like 'doctor who accepts Discovery in Sandton'.

    Impact: highEffort: low
Names that surfaced in our test queries

Sample competitor mentions (3)

Click to expand · verify these match your actual competitive set

+
  • Sandton Specialist Group
    Surfaced in 3 of 4 test queries · ~32 citation domains we identified
  • Linksfield Medical Centre
    Surfaced in 3 of 4 test queries · ~28 citation domains we identified
  • Cape Town Cardiology
    Surfaced in 2 of 4 test queries · ~21 citation domains we identified

How this scan works (and what it doesn't do).

What we verify directly
  • · Website reachability (HEAD request)
  • · JSON-LD schema present + types declared
  • · Citation domains surfaced via web search
  • · Verbatim language used by AI when it answers
What is inferred (not verified)
  • · GBP existence (no Google Maps API yet)
  • · NAP consistency across listings
  • · Competitor list (whoever appears in search)
  • · "What ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity say" — we use Claude + live web search as a proxy for these engines, not direct API calls

Score is directional — a readiness signal, not a deterministic measurement. Re-runs against the same business may vary 5-10 points because live web search is non-deterministic. Treat the score as a tier indicator (low / mid / high), not a precise ranking. Native ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity adapters are planned for Phase 1.5 (Q3 2026).

What invisibility costs

When AI recommends competitors, those leads go to them.

For a typical SA medical practice with average customer value around R18,000, even 3-12 missed inquiries per month adds up to:

Conservative estimate
R32k
per year going to competitors
Realistic upper bound
R130k
per year if competitors are well-positioned

Math: 3-12 missed inquiries/month × 12 × 5% close rate × R18,000 typical customer value. Conservative — most firms underestimate close rate from warm AI-driven leads.

This gap compounds — every month you wait, competitors widen the lead.

AI engines weight RECENCY and CONSISTENCY. Competitors who fix this in 60 days build a 6-month lead by year-end — citations get older + more trusted, content compounds, AI training cycles bake in their authority. Catching up later costs 2-3× what fixing it now does.

Local visibility signals

AI engines build their answer from your local signals.

ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity don't just read your website. They cross-reference your Google Business Profile, your reviews across HelloPeter + Google, your trusted directory listings, and your NAP consistency (Name + Address + Phone identical everywhere).

Weak in any one of these = AI engines don't recommend you.

Google Business Profile
Claimed, verified, fully populated, posting weekly
Reviews
25+ Google + HelloPeter, ≥4.5★, response rate ≥80%
Industry citations
Sector-specific (HPCSA, LSSA, BBBEE, CSD) + general (Brabys, Cylex)
NAP consistency
Name + Address + Phone identical on every listing
Schema markup
AI-readable code on your website (LocalBusiness, Service, FAQ)
Active social signals
LinkedIn (founder + company) posting + engagement
What happens next

From "I want to fix this" to your first AI citations.

  1. 01

    We review your scan + your business

    Free 15-min walkthrough call (or async by email). We confirm what the scan revealed, ask a few targeted questions, and align on what 'success in 90 days' looks like for YOUR business.

  2. 02

    We prioritise the highest-impact fixes first

    Based on real audits of SA businesses (industrial, medical, legal), we know which fixes move AI engines fastest. Schema + GBP + key citations usually compound within 30-60 days.

  3. 03

    We implement (or guide your team)

    We deploy the work directly, or hand your team a step-by-step playbook. Status updates every 3 days. Re-scan at 30 days shows before/after data.

We focus on high-impact fixes first — most likely to improve visibility within 30-60 days.

Based on real audits of South African businesses across industrial, medical, and legal sectors. Not generic AI theory — patterns from actual implementations. We can't promise specific outcomes (no honest consultant can), but we can promise the methodology + the cadence + complete transparency about what's working.

Do you want to fix this?

You've seen what AI engines say (or don't say) about businesses like A Sample Business. Here's what you can do right now.

Most prospects start with a 15-min walkthrough. If you're ready to get going, hit the primary button. Either way — your full report still arrives within 24 hours.

Haven't submitted yet? Get your personalised version of this dashboard.

Sample AI Visibility Report — See What Your Scan Looks Like — Kabelo More